Your margin back. Your judgement kept.
The billable work is judgement. The actual work is coding hundreds of lines a month per client. Zympli does the second one before anyone on your team opens the file — and the rules your practice builds along the way belong to your practice.
The firm workspace is the most complete part of Zympli — it is what the platform was built as first.
Not another tool. The typing, gone.
Zympli doesn't organise your work — the practice suites already do that, and we integrate rather than compete. It does the work.
The typing is done before a person opens the file
Statements and invoices are read, extracted and coded on arrival. What reaches your team is the exceptions — which is the work you can actually bill.
Once a partner decides, nobody decides it again
Your rules run ahead of retrieval, and retrieval runs ahead of the model. A decision made once becomes permanent for every client file it touches.
The judgement you accumulate stays yours
Your chart-of-accounts templates, your rules, your curated pool of examples. Every correction a senior makes trains your firm's library — not a vendor's shared model that your competitors also get.
Accounts that mean the same thing across clients
Charts are instantiated from industry templates rather than invented per file. Nobody reporting on top of bespoke files can compare anything meaningfully; you can.
Every client file in one place
Each with its own chart of accounts, its own rules and its own document history, under your firm — with a full audit log of what a rule, the model, or a person decided.
Drive it from the AI client you already use
For practices that live in their own tooling, Zympli will expose its capabilities over MCP, so the platform can be run from outside the browser. Not built yet.
A decision your firm made is never overridden by a guess
Your rules run first. Then retrieval over your own confirmed examples. The model decides only what nobody in your practice has decided before — and a correction from a senior outranks all of it, permanently.
This is the part that is running in production today, and it is the reason the rest of the platform is worth building on top of it.
It opines here — and it tells you which part is soft
To a business the assistant will not give a technical view; it routes. To a registered practice it will, with its working shown. That asymmetry is deliberate: you carry the registration, so you get the reasoning.
- The exchange that sells it is the third: “FY24 — I've flagged it as an assumption, not a finding”.
- A draft that marks its own soft spots is worth reviewing. One that doesn't is worth redoing.
- Shape, never citation — no provisions, no rates, no thresholds.
What's waiting on me?
Five positions drafted and waiting for a signature. Each one is a question a client's books couldn't answer.
Awaiting your review
Open the vehicle one.
Hendricks Building, sole trader. I've drafted it as a business asset with a private-use adjustment taken from the logbook they uploaded, and the depreciation limit applied. Reasoning and the source are attached.
Drafted position · vehicle deduction
Treatment, reasoning, source, and the 3 transactions it affects
How old is that logbook?
FY24. A logbook holds for several years unless the pattern of use changes materially — so I've put it in the draft as an assumption, not a finding. Worth a question before you sign.
Take private use to 35% and release it.
Updated and released under your signature. Hendricks can see it now, with the reasoning.
Released · signed by you
Client notified · recorded against their FY25 file
How much of this is coming from where?
Twenty-three positions this quarter. Two clients are most of it.
Positions reviewed · this quarter
A prepared file, not a cold lead
Businesses keeping their own books on Zympli hit questions they are not allowed an answer to — how a rule applies to them. That is the moment we intend to hand them to a registered accountant.
The moment
It fires at demonstrated need — a specific question on a specific set of books — not from someone browsing a directory at 11pm.
What arrives
Books already built, classified and auditable, with a drafted position attached: the treatment, the reasoning, the citation, and the transactions it affects. You confirm or correct, and sign.
What it isn't
A name and a phone number you have to qualify at your own cost, on a file you have to price blind.
This is designed and priced, and it is not built. Before it opens we will say plainly how a practice is admitted, who bills the validation, and where liability sits.
There's a second offer on this page
When the assistant reaches a question it may not answer, it drafts the position and sends it to a registered practitioner. That pool doesn't exist yet — this is where we're building it.
BAS agent or tax agent — the distinction matters here
A registered BAS agent may advise on GST and BAS matters. Income tax advice requires a registered tax agent. Which questions reach you follows your registration, not your interest — so the two pools are not interchangeable and we won't route as if they were.
Registering interest, not signing up — there is nothing to review yet. Before the pool opens we'll say plainly what the work pays, who bills it, and where liability sits.
Work that arrives prepared
Not a lead. A drafted position on books that are already built, classified and auditable — with the reasoning written down and the part needing your registration marked.
At the moment of demonstrated need
The business has a specific question about its own figures, right now. Nobody is browsing a directory.
You confirm or correct, and sign
The draft does not reach the business until you release it. What they see carries your signature and your reasoning.
What we're deliberately not building
These are the heart of the practice-management suites you already run. Each is a whole product, and none of them touches the engine — so we would rather integrate than pretend.
What we do build is the part that happens before any of it: the mechanical work of turning documents into a classified ledger, and the judgement your firm accumulates while checking it.
Put a month of one client's coding through it
That's the honest test and it takes an afternoon — we'll set up your chart templates and first rules with you. Or register interest as a validating agent, which is a different ask entirely.
Built in Sydney · Australian data infrastructure · No lock-in